So guys, phenomenology. Something I spent months grappling with a few years ago during my undergrad, and something that I never felt truly acquainted with. I suppose the most general understanding of phenomenology in a film studies context (that is to say, “phenomenology of perception”) is that the act of watching a film is an experiential one. That the spectator is to digest individual sensory impulses on a somehow “bodily” level.
It goes against most schools of film criticism that either praise the manipulation of aesthetic strategies or the psychological implications of narrative devices. Instead, scholars like Dudley Andrews and Vivian Sobchack write about rejecting schools of thought that impose codes and false meanings on films, and call us to reflect on the perceptual experience of film going. This was something I agreed with after learning about it, something which went alongside my existing beliefs of medium specificity – that a film was great if it could appeal to the spectator on a sensory level in a way no other medium could. So I loved Fruit Chan’s Dumplings as a teen, a film that spends most of its 90 minutes focussed on people eating, but watching it again recently made me question how much value we can place on a film through an academic rubric. Continue reading



